By GEOFF NAIRN(Published in the Times supplement on Wind & Marine Energy on November 2, 2010. Read the original here.)
Abu Dhabi is not the only deep-pocketed investor eyeing renewable energy. Pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and institutional investors are rushing to put money into renewables. What was once a niche area reserved for small specialist funds is rapidly entering the mainstream.
As well as investing in waste-to-energy, the $250m Masdar Clean Tech Fund, in which the Abu Dhabi government has $100m, owns stakes in photovoltaic firms and cleantech start-ups.
“We want to make Abu Dhabi a hub for renewables,” says Alex O’Cinneide, an Irish venture capitalist who was lured to the Emirate in 2007 to manage the venture fund. In February , Masdar launched a second “green” fund which raised $265m.
Many of the technologies it is backing will be used in Masdar City, a Norman Foster-designed “sun city” that is being built in the desert. Masdar also owns 20 per cent of the in the London Array offshore wind project.
Masdar is not just backed by oil money, however. The pension fund of German industrial giant Siemens has put $25m into its two funds.
Renewable energy start-ups may seem an unusual investment for pension funds, which have a fiduciary duty to invest prudently. But times change and pension funds and other mainstream investors are more inclined to put money into this fast-growing sector.
“We have seen significant growth of interest in renewables” says Adam Ognall, deputy chief executive of UK Sustainable Investment and Finance, whose members include four of the biggest pension funds in the UK.
“Pension funds see the way the regulated energy markets are going and growing consumer interest in low-carbon markets,” he says. “But they will only invest in renewables if it makes sense financially.”
David Russell, co-head for responsible investment at the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS), the UK’s second largest pension fund, argues fiduciary duty and green investment are compatible.
“The fund cannot make ethical or moral decisions, but there is a growing realisation that environmental, social and governance issues can impact the value of the fund and, if managed well, they can add value,” he says.
USS made its first renewable energy investment in 2000 when it bought a stake in BlackRock New Energy, the renewables-focussed investment trust. It has since invested in other renewable energy funds including two private equity vehicles. At the end of last year, it had about £150m invested in clean technology and renewable energy.
“It is very small compared to our overall portfolio but significant when compared to other pension funds and the size of the sector compared to others,” says Mr Russell.
For non-specialist investors, one way to get exposure to the renewables sector is by buying equities — or buying a fund that does.
But the universe of quoted renewable energy companies is limited and performance can be volatile.
Private equity funds let deep-pocketed green investors access a much broader universe of companies, such as biogas firms, which are a particular favourite of Masdar’s Mr O’Cinneide.
“We like waste-to-energy because it deals with a difficult environmental issue,” he says.
Another alternative to equity investment is to invest directly in renewable energy schemes.
“The problem with investing in equities is that the companies become prey to investor sentiment. We think physical assets are the way to go,” says Ben Cotton partner with Earth Capital Partners.
ECP’s latest fund targets solar and biogas projects and was launched in November  with seed capital from a pension fund. It aims to raise €750m, which gives an idea of how much institutional money is now chasing the renewables sector.
“Ten years ago there were very few people investing in the renewables area,” says Mr Russell of USS. Not any more.